The demonization of both the word climate on one end of the political spectrum and fossil fuels on the other were front and ...

More than 43 million Americans watched the vice presidential debate – and many came away with questions. Here are answers to the most common ones.

Climate change remains on the backburner of the 2024 election following little mention of environmental policy during the first -- and possibly only -- debate between the two presidential candidates.

Climate change and the administration’s energy policies came up early during the debate as Vance was pressed ... 20 gigawatts worth of annual solar panel production capacity in the U.S. within ...

Harris dominated much of the debate, taunting Trump on his crowd sizes, his past bankruptcies, his inherited wealth and his stature on the global stage. Climate change took a backseat to issues ...

"I have been in 'debates' with deniers of climate change and it is impossible to win because they tell lies and you can not bring up the evidence to show they are wrong." During Tuesday's ...

During the debate, policy expert Vicky Pollard explained that the European Commission uses data from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to direct policymaking. “The IPCC is ...

The two candidates faced off in a heavily policy-focused debate, but were all their claims on the issues accurate?

history will not look kindly at the fact that it took 1.5 hours of a debate to (briefly) get to climate change," Kimes wrote on X. "They will look back at the issues we prioritized, with great ...

debate ahead of the election on Nov. 5, it’s unclear whether or not climate change will be one of the topics they address. The two candidates have diametrically opposed views on the broad ...

Alex Brandon/AP / AP When moderators at the presidential debate asked the candidates about plans to fight climate change, Vice President Kamala Harris highlighted a problem quietly accelerating ...

The Minnesota governor did face criticism, though, for expressing support for an “all-of-the-above” energy policy.